SERMON Circles
Easter
4(C) (2007): Acts 9:36-43 Psalm 23;
Revelation 7:9-17; John 10:22-30
Today
is the Fourth Sunday of Easter, and it is Good Shepherd Sunday. It is only
appropriate that we dedicate our newly restored Good Shepherd window today.
Good
Shepherd Sundays are always about sheep as well as the Good Shepherd. Our
window depicts the story of the lost sheep -- almost. And I say
"almost" because this window always reminds me of one of our
daughters. When she was in college she was not exactly lost, but she certainly
was not flocking (if that is what in fact sheep do). I knew this. But in case I
didn't, I would have known it when I was visiting her shortly before she
graduated.
That
spring the women in our home church in
You
can probably see why our beautiful window reminds me of Immanuel Lutheran
Church Women's wayward
lambs program. Look at the window. Jesus is decidedly not holding a sheep.
Rather he is cuddling with great gentleness what can only have been a straying
lamb. This is not only the Good Shepherd window but, for me, the Wayward Lamb
Window as well.
Wayward
lambs and lost sheep are, however, the gospel for another year. As we do every
year, we just heard the 23rd psalm. We also heard the stirring words
from Revelation about the great multitude that no one can count standing before
the throne and before the Lamb who is also their shepherd. And we listened to
Jesus, that shepherd, say: "My sheep hear my voice. I know them, and they
follow me."
But
then there is what we just heard from the Acts of the Apostles. A real outlier on this the Sunday of the Good Shepherd. An outlier in which Peter travels to Joppa where, without reference
to lambs, sheep, or shepherds, he restores Dorcas to life.
Now
other than having been reminded in recent years that lambs and sheep are
susceptible to hoof and mouth and mad cow disease and can be cloned, I really
know little about sheep. (Although I will admit that, when our granddaughter
was younger, the two of us spent many Sunday afternoons playing with two
favorite toy wind-up lambs. What I know now, as I knew then, is that they say,
"Ba.") By contrast, I have always known about Dorcas.
When
I was growing up, Dorcas was one of maybe a half dozen or so
circles at
Several
years ago, my mother sent me a 1949 photograph of the
They
were extraordinary women. A few of the "older" women (who were
probably in their fifties or early sixties at the time) were from
But
there was also a great deal of serious business. The meetings were focused on a
Bible study or a speaker. All the while, items were sown for the hospitals and
orphanages and unwed mothers. Outside of the meetings, food was brought to the
grieving. Latvian families displaced by World War II were helped in resettling.
Wayward son and daughter lambs were embraced. Wedding receptions and funeral
luncheons were planned and served. (The first wedding that I ever saw was one
that
So
when we hear this morning about "a disciple whose name was
Tabitha, which in Greek is Dorcas . . . [who] . . . was devoted to good works
and acts of charity," I feel as if I know her well. I can also identify
those saints who wash her and lay her in the room upstairs. And I recognize the
widows who stand beside Peter and show him "the tunics and other clothing
that Dorcas had made while she was with them."
And
I am also so aware that there never would have been a Mary Circle or a Dorcas
Circle and all those extraordinary women I knew as a child or a Doorkeepers
without a church that recognized from its inception that women as well as men
could be disciples of the Risen Lord.
Within
the new church, Christian women were accorded respect and status that was
virtually unknown in the Greco-Roman world. Because they were, not only could
Dorcas be a disciple, but widows were cared for so they were not forced to
remarry and lose their inheritances. And because they were cared for then, they
are cared for now. But even more, in part, as the sociologist Rodney Stark
demonstrates, because of the respect and status accorded women in the early
church, "the obscure, marginal Jesus movement became the dominant
religious force in the western world in a few centuries." Heady stuff.
None
of which makes Dorcas or the Joppa saints and widows –- or the
Until
we hear Jesus say, "The Father and I are one," and "What my
Father has given me is greater than all else, and no one can snatch it out of
the Father's hand." Until we realize that, in the beautiful vision of
God's kingdom that we hear the author of Revelation describe, Jesus is both
lamb and shepherd. The Lutheran liturgist, Gordon Lathrop writes:
Lambs do not sit on
thrones. Nor do they act as shepherds to the flock.
In
But what is meant that the lamb
is the shepherd? It is, of course, the truth about Jesus that is so spoken. He
is made a weak and finally a slain man. A nothing. Yet
this very one knows his own, calls them by name, will allow no snatching out of
the flock. One who is no king at all is the only king. One who is no shepherd
is the good shepherd for all peoples.
It is the resurrection of
the crucified one which is spoken by these images. In his "knowing
us," that is his being in the midst of our agony, knowing it by sharing it, we are placed irrevocably in God's hands.
But how shall we know that?
Come to the table. Eat and
drink. In the address of the body and blood to you, hear the shepherd's voice
calling you by name, knowing you and your need. Here is the end of the hunger
and thirst, the beginning of the wiping away of all tears, the flowing of the
life-giving waters.
And
it is here, secure in a relationship that makes us one with the Father as well,
that we are enabled and emboldened to serve others. Enabled and emboldened to
be Dorcas. Enabled and emboldened to be the Body of Christ in and for the
world.
Amen
April
29, 2007
Ruth VanDemark,
pastor