SERMON Baptism
Baptism
of Our Lord C (07): Isaiah 43:1-7; Psalm 29; Acts 8:14-17; Luke 15-17, 21-22
There is something so compelling about
baptism. I discovered just how compelling baptism can be a dozen years ago when
I did my chaplaincy training at Northwestern Hospital -- a hospital that is, as
I am sure most of you know, a regional center for high risk pregnancies and
deliveries; a hospital with a state of the art neonatal intensive care unit.
For
the first several weeks that I was on call, I was called to be with parents
whose babies had died. On my very first call like that, the baby (a boy) was
full term, a beautiful, perfectly formed infant, who had mysteriously died
minutes after being born. And his distraught and grieving Lutheran parents,
both in their early thirties, wanted nothing more than that this child be
baptized. We didn’t baptize him. We blessed him and named him Peter and
committed him to God’s care. We didn't baptize him because baptism is for
living, and not the dead. Several days later, their Lutheran congregation had a
service of Christian burial for Peter. But I understood where the parents were
coming from that night. There is something so compelling about baptism.
I
thought about this often when, in the weeks after the first few, I was called
to baptize babies who had not died but who were not expected to live. The very
first baby that I baptized was born at twenty-three weeks and weighed less than
sixteen ounces. It is hard to describe how very small he was. His mother was in
So
what is about baptism that makes it so compelling? So compelling that we
baptize infants who are not going to live? So compelling that we even want to
baptize the dead?
Easy
answers might harken back to beliefs that only the baptized are saved -- and
all the superstitions that arise from those beliefs. But I don't think that's
it. Certainly not with the parents whose babies we named or baptized in the
five months I was at Northwestern.
But
what is it? Why so compelling?
An
interesting question in light of what we just heard.
In
many ways Jesus' baptism is anything but compelling in Luke's gospel. One of
the dozen or so things we can say with confidence about the historical Jesus is
that he was baptized by John the Baptist and, in all probability, was John's
disciple before John's imprisonment and beheading. Luke and the other gospel
writers are quite aware that the implications of Jesus' being baptized by John
has the potential of making Jesus look like a Johnny-come-lately, second banana
to John the Baptist -- someone who had a strong following well into the late
first century. Luke even recognizes John's continuing influence in Acts when he
tells of Paul's going to Ephesus and finding individuals who had been baptized
"[i]nto John's baptism" (Acts 18:3). It also makes Jesus look as if
he needed John's baptism of repentance.
Jesus'
baptism was so non-compelling to the gospel writers that the author of the
Gospel of John doesn't even mention that Jesus was baptized (even though it is
obvious that he knows that he was).
Luke
takes a different approach. Jesus is baptized. Good writer and story teller
that he is, Luke goes to great lengths to reexamine John's relationship to
Jesus and to disguise any role that he plays in Jesus' baptism.
Part
of Luke's approach is to place the nativity stories about John in the context
of the nativity stories about Jesus.
You
will recall that Mary, pregnant with Jesus, visits
When
John is circumcised, his father foretells that John will be "a prophet of
the Most High [who will] go before the Lord to prepare his ways." (Luke
1:76). Luke's approach includes what we just heard John say: he -- John -- is
not the Messiah, but one more powerful than he is coming, the thong of whose
sandals he is unworthy to untie (a job, by the way, that was left to only the
lowliest of slaves).
And
then Luke obscures any role John plays in baptizing Jesus. The verses we did
not hear this morning are Luke's account of John's imprisonment by Herod. Only
with John in prison does Luke mention that "Jesus was also baptized."
(Luke 3:21) He never says by whom.
But
Luke does not stop there. To reinforce John's statement that he is not the
Messiah, Luke reports that after Jesus' baptism, the Holy Spirit descends in
the physical form of a dove, and God tells Jesus, "You are my Son, the
Beloved; with you I am well pleased" (Luke 3:22). To dispel any thought
that Jesus is John's disciple, Luke distinguishes John's baptism of water and
Jesus' baptism of the Holy Spirit.
And
it's baptism by the Holy Spirit that we hear about in Acts. Philip has baptized
the Samaritans with water in the name of Jesus Christ. When that occurs the top guns -- Peter and John -- are sent from
So
if Jesus' baptism is something that had to be explained away if not ignored,
what is it that makes baptism so compelling for us?
Well,
let's remember, it is the early church, not Jesus, that finds Jesus' baptism by
John non-compelling. Jesus is baptized. By
John. Like us, Jesus finds baptism compelling.
And
the reason why he does is obvious. For John, baptism involves water and the
redirection of one's life. "Repentance" meant "turning
around." And that is what Jesus is doing as he is simultaneously baptized
and beginning his public ministry -- not that he is turning from a sinful life
but that he is redirecting his life to God's work. But more.
For Jesus, baptism also marks God's acknowledgment through the Holy Spirit that
he, Jesus, is indeed God's son -- an event in Luke (and only in Luke) that
occurs when Jesus is praying.
And
for the early church, this baptism was carried one step further. The new
believers in
Which is why baptism is so very
compelling. It is why we want even the smallest
members of our families to know and to grow in God’s free gift of grace through
baptism.
Two
weeks ago I received what has become an annual Christmas card and letter from
Moving because, when Daniel was born in
1995, Northwestern had just begun having success with the survival of babies
born at 23 weeks. No hospital in his home town in
In
a few years, Daniel will affirm the baptismal vows made by his sponsors that
February after he left
Amen
January
7, 2007
Ruth VanDemark,
pastor